On this page
Identify the current framework
The FRC uses apply-and-explain principles for asset owners and managers, with separate principles for service providers. Its scope includes investment consultants, proxy advisers and engagement providers. This page describes that UK framework; it does not present it as a compulsory rule for every investor worldwide.
Distinguish the two reporting parts
| Part | Purpose and frequency |
|---|---|
| Policy and Context Disclosure | Organisation, governance and policies; normally every fourth year, or when relevant changes make it inconsistent with the activities report |
| Activities and Outcomes Report | Application of principles through the previous year’s activities and outcomes; annually |
Evaluate an activity-only response
In this fictional case, an asset owner delegates issuer dialogue to a manager. The owner receives a list of ten meetings and labels the whole engagement programme successful. To assess that conclusion, ask what the meetings sought to change, what responses occurred and what evidence supports the claimed result. Ten meetings with no change could justify continued work; one meeting with a documented change could resolve a narrowly defined objective. The count does not settle either conclusion.
Build a more informative case record
For the exercise, take one objective and record the initial issue, requested change, response, evidence, status and next decision. Compare that record with the original meeting list. The additional fields allow a reader to assess the stated objective, while a bare list supports only a claim that meetings occurred. This is an illustrative learning record, not an FRC application form.