Skip to content

Profitability-index conventions

Two related ratios can differ by one under a single-initial-outlay model; label the convention before comparing thresholds.

On this page

Define both ratios under stated conditions

PIgross=PVfutureI0,PInet=NPVI0=PIgross−1PI_{gross}=\frac{PV_{future}}{I_0},\quad PI_{net}=\frac{NPV}{I_0}=PI_{gross}-1

I_0 > 0 is the only initial outlay, and NPV = PV_future − I_0 under this simple convention.

Synthetic I_0 = 100 and PV_future = 120
RatioValueZero-NPV threshold
Gross receipt-PV ratio1.21
Net NPV-to-outlay ratio0.20

Identify what remains the same

Subtracting one preserves rankings when both conventions use the same project definitions and positive initial outlays. It changes the numerical threshold, so an unlabelled comparison with one or zero can produce a mistaken statement.

Do not extend the identity to every financing schedule

Additional outlays, different dates or a different denominator require a defined convention. A label such as profitability index is insufficient to reconstruct the equation if those details are absent.

Keep a ratio from replacing feasible-set analysis

Even a correctly computed ratio does not automatically solve an indivisible capital budget. Evaluate actual feasible combinations and dependencies. The counterexample below uses a fixed net-ratio convention and still defeats a greedy ranking.

Further references