CFA® bond covenants: which actions must an issuer take?

On this page

An affirmative bond covenant requires the issuer to do something, while a negative covenant limits an action the issuer might take. Both sit in the bond indenture, the contract that states the bond's terms and the parties' rights. To classify a clause, look at the action it requires or prohibits, then read its conditions and remedies before deciding what a breach means.

Read the obligation, not just its label

An indenture sets out payment terms and contractual protections for bondholders. CFA Institute's Level I fixed-income overview identifies both indenture contents and the contrast between affirmative and negative covenants as learning outcomes. A research publication from CFA Institute Research Foundation describes affirmative clauses as requiring issuer action and negative clauses as restricting action.

Think of an affirmative clause as a continuing undertaking: deliver accounts, maintain insurance or preserve specified financial conditions. A negative clause restricts an issuer decision, such as adding certain debt, paying distributions or pledging assets. The precise definitions, exceptions and thresholds belong to the particular contract. A broad label alone cannot tell an analyst whether a proposed transaction is permitted.

Classify a fictional indenture

Suppose an invented issuer has an indenture with the following clauses. The terms and amounts are illustrative and do not describe an actual bond. The issuer must deliver quarterly financial statements to the trustee. It must also maintain insurance on a named facility. Separately, it may not incur more than £20 million of additional secured debt unless existing bonds receive equal security.

Download CSV

Article data

Deliver quarterly statements	Affirmative	Requires a recurring action
Maintain facility insurance	Affirmative	Requires continuing cover
Limit additional secured debt	Negative	Restricts a financing action

Now assume the issuer proposes £25 million of additional secured debt with no equal security for existing bonds. The proposal exceeds the illustrative £20 million limit by £5 million, so it would conflict with that negative clause as written. A proposal is not necessarily a completed breach; first establish whether the debt has actually been incurred, and check defined terms, exceptions and any required consent.

What happens after a breach

Do not jump from an apparent breach to immediate repayment. The contract may specify notice, a period to remedy the problem, a waiver process or a threshold for declaring an event of default. The analyst should read those provisions, identify who can act, and distinguish a covenant violation from an exercised acceleration right. CFA Institute Research Foundation notes that a breach can lead to default and acceleration; the wording of the particular indenture controls that path.

The common exam error is to classify by economic effect alone: a financial maintenance requirement restricts management in practice, yet its wording obliges the issuer to maintain a condition, making it affirmative in this simple classification. Start with the operative verb, then inspect the condition and remedy. The CFA program page places fixed income in the wider syllabus, while Omni's methodology page sets out a study approach for revisiting distinctions like this.