On this page
A machine purchase that meets IAS 16’s asset recognition conditions must be capitalised, with its cost charged to profit over its useful life through depreciation. Recording that same qualifying purchase as an immediate expense would overstate the first-period charge and understate the asset; it is an accounting error, not an optional IFRS policy. IAS 7 classifies the cash paid to acquire the long-term asset as investing regardless of that error.
Decide whether there is an asset first
For property, plant and equipment under IFRS, IAS 16 requires probable future economic benefits and a cost that can be measured reliably. Its description of the asset also requires expected use beyond the current period. A planned benefit alone is therefore insufficient: check the nature of the expenditure and the recognition criteria before comparing statement effects. CFA Institute’s long-term assets reading explains why differing policies complicate company comparisons.
An acquired machine that meets those conditions enters the balance sheet at cost and is depreciated over its useful life. A routine service that merely maintains current operations is normally an expense. The economic benefit test does not give management a free choice to capitalise any spending it expects to help later.
An illustrative first-year comparison
Assume a company pays £100,000 at the start of a period for a qualifying machine, uses straight-line depreciation over five years, expects no residual value, and ignores tax and impairment. The amounts are invented for illustration. Compare the required treatment with an erroneous entry that charges the entire purchase to expense immediately; the latter is not a permitted choice for this machine under IAS 16.
| Correct: capitalise | £20,000 depreciation | £20,000 lower | £80,000 |
| Error: expense purchase | £100,000 expense | £100,000 lower | £0 |
The erroneous expense entry would leave first-year profit and the machine asset £80,000 below the correctly capitalised case. If the error were left uncorrected, the later years would also lack the £20,000 annual depreciation charge. Across the assumed five-year life, the entries would recognise the same £100,000 cost in total, but in the wrong periods. The comparison isolates the timing effect of a mistake; it does not describe an IFRS accounting policy election.
Check the cash-flow statement separately
IAS 7 classifies cash flows by activity. Paying £100,000 to acquire this long-term machine is an investing outflow, whether the machine is recorded correctly or its cost is mistakenly expensed in the income statement. The accounting error does not turn the purchase into an operating cash payment. Depreciation is non-cash, so it does not create another outflow.
A genuinely different payment, such as a routine operating service, would normally be an operating outflow because of what was purchased, not because its cost appears as an expense. For the machine, first-year total cash falls by £100,000 and the investing cash outflow is £100,000 in both the correct entry and the erroneous-entry comparison. The CFA programme page puts financial statement analysis in context, and the cash-flow classification guide helps with the separate activity test.
The common candidate mistake
Candidates often jump from “future benefit” straight to “asset”, or assume the income-statement entry dictates the cash-flow section. Apply the asset recognition test first, calculate the current depreciation and remaining carrying amount, then classify the actual payment by its nature. Do not treat immediate expensing of a qualifying machine as a free IFRS choice, and do not count depreciation as a second cash payment.
Sources
- Analysis of Long-Term Assets | CFA Institute · cfainstitute.org · Retrieved
- IFRS - IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment · ifrs.org · Retrieved
- IFRS - IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows · ifrs.org · Retrieved
