On this page
Practise FRM® questions in two modes: untimed work to explain why an answer is right, followed by timed sets that force a decision under the real exam's constraints. GARP says both parts use equally weighted multiple-choice questions in a four-hour computer-based exam: Part I has 100 questions and Part II has 80. Those facts make accuracy, pacing and recovery from an uncertain item separate skills to rehearse.
What GARP actually specifies
GARP's FRM programme and exam page states the question counts, equal weighting, multiple-choice format and time allowed for each part. Part I covers foundational tools across risk management, quantitative analysis, markets and products, and valuation and risk models. Part II focuses on applying risk tools across areas such as market, credit, operational and liquidity risk, investment management and current issues. This is a broad, practice-oriented assessment rather than a sequence of essays. The published format does not tell you the difficulty of your particular paper or which topic will appear in any one item.
Equal question weighting means a candidate cannot recover more exam credit merely because a difficult item took longer to solve. That is a reason to set a time boundary, not a reason to guess thoughtlessly. If you cannot identify the required method, record a provisional answer, mark the item if the exam interface allows it, and move on according to your own plan. Return if time remains. This is an editorial practice method derived from the format, not a rule that GARP promises any specific mark for partial work or provides a universal per-question timer.
A simple planning calculation is possible from GARP's published totals. Four hours are 240 minutes. Dividing by 100 gives a Part I average of 2.4 minutes per question; dividing by 80 gives a Part II average of 3 minutes. These are arithmetic averages, not official time limits for individual items. Some conceptual questions may be quick; a multi-step calculation may be slower. Your timed practice should test whether the whole set fits, including reading, checking and navigating, rather than forcing every item into an identical interval.
Use untimed questions to build explanations
Early in a topic, take a small set without a clock and write a reason for the selected answer before looking at the solution. Then explain why each tempting alternative fails. For a numerical item, identify the inputs, units, formula and sign before calculating. For a conceptual item, identify the distinction the stem tests. The purpose is to expose errors that a raw score hides: recognising a familiar phrase while missing a qualifier, applying the right formula to the wrong quantity, or treating a plausible answer as sufficient without checking the others.
Keep the explanation short enough to be repeatable. An error log can record the concept, the incorrect step and the next diagnostic prompt you will use. 'I forgot liquidity risk' is too broad to guide a later attempt; 'I treated the quoted spread as a default probability without a recovery assumption' describes an actionable mistake. Rework the same idea with different invented numbers after a delay. Do not memorise the exact wording of one item, because the exam may approach the concept from another direction. The aim is transfer of reasoning, not recognition of a stored answer.
GARP's study materials page says registered Part I candidates receive official full-length practice exams of 100 questions through GARP Learning, while registered Part II candidates receive full-length practice exams of 80 questions as downloadable PDFs. It also distinguishes chapter practice questions on GARP Learning from questions representative of the actual FRM exam. Treat that distinction seriously. Chapter questions can reveal a local conceptual gap, but an official practice exam is better suited to testing breadth and timing under the stated format. Access and delivery details belong to GARP and may change with the registered exam window.
Turn a full-length practice exam into a decision rehearsal
Before starting, decide how you will handle uncertainty. One workable method is an initial pass through items you can resolve confidently, recording a provisional choice on slower ones, then a return pass. Another is to answer strictly in order with a firm time boundary. Neither is officially prescribed by GARP; test both in your own practice and keep whichever maintains accuracy without leaving a large unanswered tail. Use the whole four-hour interval if you are simulating a full exam. Put distractions away and use the calculator you expect to use within GARP's permitted models, after checking its current policy.
For a worked pacing illustration, imagine a Part I mock of 100 equally weighted items. If your first pass uses 180 minutes and resolves 75 items, you have 60 minutes for 25 provisional items and checking. That is an average of 2.4 minutes for the remaining group, but your actual allocation should follow the difficulty of those items. If instead 40 remain after 180 minutes, the same hour offers only 1.5 minutes each on average. This fictional example shows why you need a checkpoint while time can still be redistributed; it is not a target score, an official benchmark or a prediction of exam performance.
Review the mock in two passes. First inspect every wrong answer and every correct answer reached by weak reasoning. Categorise the cause as concept, setup, arithmetic, reading or time management. Then inspect the final portion of the paper for evidence of rushing: missed qualifiers, calculator keystrokes, incomplete stems or answers changed without justification. A practice score alone cannot tell you whether study time should go to credit risk or to speed. The error pattern can. When an item took too long, ask whether the underlying method was unfamiliar or whether you failed to stop when it became unproductive.
Part I and Part II need different emphases
Part I practice should make foundational methods retrievable across topic boundaries. Work on recognising which model or relationship a scenario calls for, then calculating with clear units and interpreting the result. Part II asks more often for an applied risk judgement across its published domains. That does not make Part II free of calculation, and it does not make Part I a pure formula test. In both parts, turn a chosen option into a one-sentence explanation. For Part II especially, state the assumption that would change your decision; this guards against learning a rule so rigidly that it fails in a new setting.
Mix topics as the exam approaches. A chapter set announces its subject in advance, which removes the task of recognising the subject from the stem. A mixed set restores that diagnostic step. Follow a mixed session with targeted repair of the weakest area, then return to mixing. The GARP FAQs confirm that both exams are delivered through computer-based testing, so practising navigation, answer selection and a disciplined return process is relevant. Do not assume a particular screen feature without checking the tutorial for your test provider and location.
What to check before exam day
Format practice is also operational. GARP's exam FAQs describe the test-centre setting, a printed appointment confirmation, original valid identification, approved calculator requirements and scratch-paper arrangements. Review the current official instructions for your appointment and location rather than taking this article as a complete packing list. Those rules affect the practice environment: use an approved calculator type, rehearse work on limited paper, and avoid dependence on tools that cannot accompany you. Any exact arrival or identification condition should be taken from the current GARP confirmation and policy pages.
The FRM programme page places Part I and Part II in context, and the Omni how-it-works page describes the study environment. Use practice questions to decide your next study action rather than accumulating attempts for their own sake. A useful session ends with a small repair task: revisit one misunderstood method, redo one calculation without the solution, or rehearse the time boundary that failed. That makes the next timed set a genuine test of change.
A compact practice loop
Start with untimed explanation until you can distinguish the right answer from attractive alternatives. Move to timed mixed sets, then use an official full-length practice exam to test endurance and pacing against GARP's published format. Review both wrong answers and lucky correct ones, repair the underlying errors, and retest in a new context. The format gives you a finite time budget and equally weighted decisions; it does not supply a secret scoring trick. The best practice plan makes your reasoning clear enough to survive the clock.
Sources
- FRM Program and Exams · garp.org · Retrieved
- FRM Study Materials · garp.org · Retrieved
- FRM Exam FAQs · garp.org · Retrieved
