Skip to content

Economic order quantity and the ordering-holding trade-off

The basic EOQ model balances annual ordering cost against annual holding cost for a continuous order quantity under restrictive assumptions.

On this page

Define the modeled costs

TC(Q)=DQK+Q2hTC(Q)=\frac{D}{Q}K+\frac{Q}{2}h

D is annual unit demand, K is fixed cost per order and h is holding cost per unit per year.

Basic deterministic assumptions
FeatureAssumption
DemandKnown and constant over time
OrdersFixed order cost and a continuous quantity
ReplenishmentThe simple cycle-inventory model
Omitted termsSafety stock, shortages, varying purchase prices and other constraints

Explain the opposite cost movements

A larger Q reduces the number of orders per year but increases average cycle inventory Q/2. At the unconstrained continuous optimum, the two modeled annual costs are equal. That equality belongs to this objective, not every inventory system.

Check feasible quantities separately

A supplier may require minimum quantities, pack sizes or integer units. Evaluate the relevant feasible quantities and costs instead of assuming a fractional output is an order you can place.

Add omitted risks when the task requires them

Uncertain demand and lead time can require a buffer or a different model. Lowering inventory without that context can increase shortage exposure. The basic EOQ result does not determine the entire operating policy.

Further references