Skip to content

Compare actual expectation with a pricing-weighted value

An actual higher-state probability of 70% changes expected payoff, while the fixed underlying pricing model still gives q=50%.

On this page

Separate the two weight sources

The hypothetical underlying record is S0=100, states 130/80 and factor 1.05. The strike-100 call pays 30/0. Separately, an actual probability assumption assigns 70% to the higher state.

Compute both expiry expectations

Actual expected payoff is 0.7×30+0.3×0=21. The pricing-weighted payoff is 0.5×30+0.5×0=15. Their difference comes from the weighting measure, not from a change in the option contract.

Reconcile the model value

Replication and pricing weights give current value 15/1.05=14.285714. Dividing actual expectation 21 by 1.05 instead gives 20 and does not match that model.

Different weighted quantities
MeasureExpiry amountRisk-free division
Actual assumption2120, not the replication price
Model pricing weight1514.285714

Do not declare the actual assumption false

The model does not estimate or refute the 70% forecast. It establishes that the forecast probability is not interchangeable with its pricing weight. Valuing an actual risky expectation needs a separately justified discount or pricing framework.

Further references