Skip to content

Correlated observations and effective information

Positive dependence can make a mean less precise than an independent-sample calculation with the same n.

On this page

State the covariance model

Suppose n measurements each have variance sigma² and every distinct pair has covariance rho × sigma². This is an equicorrelation illustration, not a description of every cluster or time series. The admissible correlation range must make the covariance matrix valid.

Include all pairwise covariance terms

The variance of the mean is sigma²[1 + (n − 1)rho]/n. For n = 10 and rho = 0.2, the bracket is 2.8. The independent formula sigma²/10 would omit those positive covariance contributions.

Define a limited equivalent count

Matching this variance to sigma²/n_eff gives n_eff = n/[1 + (n − 1)rho]. In the stated example, n_eff ≈ 3.5714. It is a variance-equivalent count for this estimator and model, not a new number of observed rows or a universal degrees-of-freedom formula.

Ten-observation equicorrelation illustration
rhoVariance multiplier versus independencen_eff
0110
0.22.83.5714286
1101

Use the actual design for a real uncertainty estimate

Within-branch relationships, unequal group sizes and temporal dependence can require a more specific covariance calculation. Do not substitute a guessed rho or this effective count into every test. The illustration explains why collecting many related records can add less information than independent records.

Further references