On this page
Specify the valuation scenarios
The original case fixes paid-in 100 and distributions 40. It considers residual estimates 50, 80, 110 and 140 solely as illustrative inputs. They are not probabilities, valuations of a named fund or a forecast path.
Calculate the conditional ratios
TVPI = (40+V)/100, so the four inputs produce 0.9×, 1.2×, 1.5× and 1.8×. DPI stays 0.4×. The derivative with respect to V is 1/100 on this fixed base.
| Residual input | RVPI | TVPI |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | 0.5× | 0.9× |
| 80 | 0.8× | 1.2× |
| 110 | 1.1× | 1.5× |
| 140 | 1.4× | 1.8× |
Paid-in 100 and distributions 40 are fixed. The horizontal axis is a hypothetical residual input, not calendar time; no probability is assigned. This is an illustrative example.
View the chart values
| Series | Residual value input | TVPI (×) |
|---|---|---|
| TVPI | 50 | 0.9 |
| TVPI | 80 | 1.2 |
| TVPI | 110 | 1.5 |
| TVPI | 140 | 1.8 |
Read the slope as a unit effect
The linear relationship shows how this ratio depends on its input. It does not identify which residual estimate is justified. An uncertainty range needs evidence beyond choosing convenient chart endpoints.
Do not ignore changes in other components
A new contribution changes paid-in, and a distribution can change both distributed and residual value. Those cases require a new complete record rather than treating every ratio movement as a valuation-only change.